The primary reason for – and the ultimate test of – any AR solution is its return on investment (ROI). Yet when large organizations attempt to conduct ROI analyses on emerging technologies like Augmented Reality, they often encounter obstacles and unknown variables.

With its AR ROI Calculator, the AREA has taken the lead in helping enterprises quantify the benefits of AR solutions. On May 23^rd, we’re taking the next step by hosting a free webinar, How Does AR Impact Your Organization’s Bottom Line?

AREA members Paul Davies, President of the AREA and Boeing Associate Technical Fellow, and Jay Kim, AREA VP of Provider segment and Upskill Chief Strategy Officer, will share their respective experiences with ROI and discuss how the AREA’s members-only research offers strategic value to their companies.

The AREA research ROI report was prepared by Chris Ambrosio from Strategy Analytics, under contract with the AREA. Mr. Ambrosio will also be on the webinar to explore how to overcome major hurdles when assessing the impacts of AR on a company’s performance and to demonstrate the AREA AR ROI Calculator.

It’s a webinar anyone seeking to pursue AR will not want to miss. Click here to sign up now.

Deep in the snow of a wintery Chicago, the annual AREA/DMDII workshop was a hotbed of activity!

The sessions attracted around 120 attendees comprising speakers, exhibitors, academics and those representing both commercial AR technology providers and companies using or looking to use AR within their business. Given the rarity of having such a collection of AR practitioners in one place, Glen Oliver (Lockheed Martin) and I wanted to harness this collective brainpower! Together, we represented the AREA Requirements Committee whose remit is to develop a set of industry requirements and use cases to help promote the adoption of AR.

The AREA Requirements Committee strongly believes that in order to benefit the entire ecosystem we need to effectively and impactfully articulate how AR technology can be applied to business problems, what capabilities are needed within AR solutions and, perhaps more importantly, what is the business value of these tools? This will help both vendors and users of AR.

So, with three hours allotted from a precious agenda, how to best use this time? The approach taken was to introduce the importance of developing a linked and connected schema of needs followed by group activities. Here’s what followed:

Backdrop

We began with a summary of the requirements capture, already started at the previous AREA/DMDII workshop. At that session, we captured 96 requirements, split roughly equally between hardware and software. Whilst this was a great start, the outcome resulted in a list of requirements with little context, structure, priority and limited ability to leverage the community to contribute towards them. At the same time, the AREA has collected a number of great use cases which have value to companies wishing to investigate where AR may be applied but the current use cases need more detail to be actionable and linked to derived requirements. More needed to be done!

So, we presented a proposed ‘AREA Schema of Needs, as shown below.

The idea is quite simple. We need to build a hierarchically linked set of needs, in various technology areas, that have bi-directional linkages to the use cases which incorporate the requirements. In turn, the use cases are linked to scenarios which define an end-to-end business process.

These scenarios occur in various settings (including engineering, manufacturing, field service, user operation, etc.) and, ultimately, are relevant in one or more industries (automotive, health care, industrial equipment and other industry verticals).

In order to set the scene, the presenters walked through examples of each of the taxonomy fields. For example, a sample field service scenario was provided as follows:

A field service technician arrives at the site of an industrial generator. They use their portable device to connect to a live data stream of IoT data from the generator to view a set of diagnostics and service history of the generator.

Using the AR device and app they are able to pinpoint the spatial location of the reported error code on the generator. The AR service app suggests a number of procedures to perform. One of the procedures requires a minor disassembly.

The technician is presented with set of step by step instructions, each of which provides an in-context 3D display of the step.

With a subsequent procedure, there is an anomaly which neither the technician nor the app is able to diagnose. The technician makes an interactive call to a remote  subject matter expert who connects into the live session. Following a discussion, the SME annotates visual locations over the shared display, resulting in a successful repair.

The job requires approximately one hour to perform. The device should allow for uninterrupted working during the task.

With the job finished, the technician completes the digital paperwork and marks the job complete (which is duly stored in the on-line service record of the generator).

In this example, the items in blue are links to underlying use cases which need to be supported in order to enable this scenario. Similarly, examples were presented for use cases and requirements needs.

We also introduced the notion of “Levels of Maturity.” This is a useful concept as it enables both users and suppliers of technology solutions to identify roadmap progression, with an eye on future, richer adoption or delivery. Alternatively, not all users of the technology need the most advanced solution now, but they can identify what might make business sense to them in the shorter term.

Group Exercise

With the backdrop complete, we moved into the interactive portion of the session. The audience was split into 17 table groups, each with a mix of people from industrial users, commercial suppliers and academics. The idea was to get a blend of perspectives for the group activity.

Delegates hard at work!

Armed with a set of templates furnished by Glen, the 17 teams were set the following exercise:Delegates hard at work!

1. Choose your industry and setting
2. Provide a written definition of the scenario
3. Highlight the “use case” chunks that form the scenario
4. Describe at least three of the supporting use cases
5. Capture some of the derived requirements/needs
6. Construct a maturity model
7. BONUS: Describe the value proposition of using AR in this scenario

Whilst each team was given a high-level scenario (e.g. “manufacturing operation” or “design review”), they were free to choose their own, if they wished.

It was great to see the level of discussion taking place across all of the tables! One of our objectives for the exercise was to use the outputs from the team as further content for helping populate a future database. However, the primary point of the exercise was to mix the attendees and have them focused on articulating scenarios, use cases and requirements in a structured way that can also be tied back to business value.

At the end of the session, a spokesperson for each team stood up and summarised the results of their work.

Outcome

Each team duly handed in their handwritten efforts, which were transcribed into a more usable digital form and are now available to AREA members by following this link below and opening up the transcription of the group’s outputs:

Augmented Reality Functional Requirements

So, what did we learn?

The teams have supplied an impressive amount of ideas which are summarised in the PDF. One unfortunate aspect of this is that we were unable to capture what were clearly detailed and illuminating discussions that were taking place across all of the tables. In some ways, perhaps, the ability to openly discuss these topics was possibly more valuable to the teams than what was written down.

The scenarios discussed included (but were not limited to) the following:

Additionally, these scenarios were described within a number of industries and settings.

Furthermore, we received some very positive anecdotal feedback from the delegates. One person stated, “This exercise was worth the trip in itself!”

One of the aims of the AREA Requirements Committee is to develop an online database to enable community participation in defining these needs and use cases. This exercise was a great incremental step in that journey. We look forward to building out this model for the benefit of the AR ecosystem and encouraging all to participate.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the DMDII team for onsite support and to all of the workshop delegates for making this a highly productive exercise.

With the recent publication of our Measuring AR ROI Calculator and Best Practices Report, we at the AREA are demonstrating our commitment to addressing obstacles that enterprises face when introducing and expanding their AR initiatives.

The report, calculator and case study are the output of the second in an ongoing series of research projects aimed at addressing the critical questions faced by enterprises seeking to launch and expand AR initiatives.

“The ROI report and the detailed case study prepared by Strategy Analytics for the AREA offer the most detailed explanations of the factors that must be considered when preparing a complete ROI analysis on AR and help to pinpoint where impacts will be greatest,” said Christine Perey, PEREY Research & Consulting, and the chair of the AREA Research Committee. “The calculator with instructions is the first tool of its kind and can be used immediately by business planners and AR project managers.”

Selected and funded directly by members, the AREA research projects offer tangible value, not only to enterprises developing their AR strategies, but also AR solution providers and non-commercial members. Member-exclusive research results include:

• The Wearable Enterprise AR Security – Risks and Management report offers a validated, comprehensive approach for assessing cyber and data vulnerabilities and formulating risk mitigation plans.
• The Wearable Enterprise AR – Security Framework and Test Protocol provides a structured framework for enterprises to characterize the security threats associated with wearables and to assess major vulnerabilities against that framework. The test protocol also identifies key metrics for measuring real-world risks.
• The ROI Best Practices Report and Case Study provide guidance and a highly-developed spreadsheet produces ROI estimates to help organizations identify, prioritize, and manage costs and returns on their AR investments.

For more information, please email [email protected].

The Augmented Reality Enterprise Alliance (AREA) and the Digital Manufacturing and Design Innovation Institute (DMDII), a UI LABS collaboration recently hosted the 2^nd Enterprise AR workshop at the UI Labs in Chicago. With over 110 attendees from enterprises who have purchased and are deploying AR solutions, to providers offering leading-edge AR solutions, to non-commercial organisations, such as universities and government agencies

“The goal of the workshop is to bring together practitioners of Enterprise AR to enable open and wide conversation on the state of the ecosystem and to identify and solve barriers to adoption,” commented Mark Sage, the Executive Director of the AREA.

Hosted at the excellent UI LABS and supported by the AREA members, the attendees enjoyed two days of discussions, networking, and interactive sessions.

Here’s a brief video summary capturing some of the highlights.

Introduction from the Event Sponsors

Sponsored by Boeing and Upskill, the workshop was kicked off by Paul Davies, Associate Technical Fellow at Boeing and the AREA President. His introduction focused on the status of the Enterprise AR ecosystem, highlighting the benefits gained from AR and some of the challenges that need to be addressed.

Summary of AR Benefits

Mr Davies added, “We at Boeing are pleased to be Gold sponsors of this workshop. It was great to listen to and interact with other companies who are working on AR solutions. The ability to discuss in detail the issues and potential solutions allows Boeing and the ecosystem to learn quickly.”

 Developing the Enterprise AR Requirements Schema

The rest of the day focused on brainstorming and developing a set of use cases that the AREA will build on to create the AREA requirements / needs database and ultimately be added to the AREA Marketplace. The session was led by Glen Oliver, Research Engineer from AREA member Lockheed Martin, and Dr. Michael Rygol, Managing Director of Chrysalisforge.

The attendees were organized into 17 teams and presented with an AR use case (based on the use cases documented by the AREA). The teams were asked to add more detail to the use case and define a scenario (a definition of how to solve the business problems often containing a number of use cases and technologies).

The following example was provided:

• A field service technician arrives at the site of an industrial generator. They use their portable device
  to connect to a live data stream of IoT data from the generator to view a set of diagnostics and
  service history of the generator.
• Using the AR device and app they are able to pinpoint the spatial location of the reported error code
  on the generator. The AR service app suggests a number of procedures to perform. One of the
  procedures requires a minor disassembly.
• The technician is presented with a set of step-by-step instructions, each of which provides an in-context 3D display of the step.
• With a subsequent procedure, there is an anomaly which neither the technician nor the app is able to diagnose. The technician makes an interactive call to a remote subject matter expert who connects into the live session. Following a discussion, the SME annotates visual locations over the shared display, resulting in a successful repair.
• The job requires approximately one hour to perform, meaning the portable device should function without interruption throughout the task.
• With the job complete, the technician completes the digital paperwork and marks the job complete
  (which is duly stored in the on-line service record of the generator).

*blue = use case

The tables were buzzing with debate and discussion with a lot of excellent output. The use of a maturity model to highlight the changes in scenarios was a very useful tool. At the end of the session the table leaders were asked to present their feedback on how useful the conversations had been.

Technology Showcase and Networking Session

The day ended with a networking session where the following companies provided demos of their solutions:

Day 2: Focus on Barriers to AR Adoption

The second day of the workshop started with an insightful talk from Jay Kim, Chief Strategy Officer at Upskill (event Sliver sponsors) who outlined the benefits of Enterprise AR and how to avoid “pilot purgatory” (i.e., the continual cycle of delivering pilots with limited industrialisation of the solution).

Next, Lars Bergstrom, at Mozilla Research, provided a look into how enterprises will soon be able to deliver AR experiences to any AR device via a web browser. The attendees found the session very interesting to understand the potential of WebAR and how it might benefit their organisations.

Barriers to Enterprise AR Adoption – Safety and Security

The next two sessions generated discussion and debate on two of the key barriers to adoption of Enterprise AR. Expertly moderated by the AREA Committee chairs for:

• Security – Tony Hodgson, Bob Labelle and Frank Cohee of Brainwaive LLC
• Safety – Dr. Brian Laughlin, Technical Fellow at Boeing

Both session provided an overview of the potential issues for enterprises deploying AR and providers building AR solutions. Again, many attendees offered contributions on the issues, possible solutions and best practice in these fields.

The AREA will document the feedback and share the content with the attendees, as well as using it to help inform the AREA committees dedicated to providing insight, research and solutions to these barriers.

Barriers to Enterprise AR Adoption – Change Management

Everyone was brought back together to participate in a panel session focusing on change management, both from an organisation and human perspective.

Chaired by Mark Sage, the panel included thought leaders and practitioners:

• Paul Davies – Associate Technical Fellow at Boeing
• Mimi Hsu – Corporate Digital Manufacturing lead at Lockheed Martin
• Beth Scicchitano – Project Manager for the AR Team at Newport News Shipbuilding
• Jay Kim – Chief Strategy Officer at Upskill
• Carl Byers – Chief Strategy Officer at Contextere

After a short introduction, the questions focused on “if AR should be a topic discussed at the CEO level or by the IT / Innovation teams.” After insightful comments from the panel, the audience was asked to provide their input.

Questions then focused on how to convince the workforce to embrace AR. Boeing, Newport News Shipbuilding and Lockheed Martin provided practical and useful examples.

There followed a range of questions from the audience with the panel members offering their experiences in how their organisations have been able to overcome some of the change management challenges when implementing AR solutions.

Final Thoughts

The general feedback on the two days was excellent. The ability to share, debate and discuss the potential and challenges of Enterprise AR was useful for all attendees.

The AREA; the only global, membership-funded, non-profit alliance dedicated to helping accelerate the adoption of Enterprise AR by supporting the growth of a comprehensive ecosystem and its members to develop thought leadership content, reduce the barriers to adoption and run workshops to help enterprises effectively implement Augmented Reality technology to create long-term benefits.

Will continue to work with The Digital Manufacturing and Design Innovation Institute (DMDII), where innovative manufacturers go to forge their futures. In partnership with UI LABS and the Department of Defense, DMDII equips U.S. factories with the digital tools and expertise they need to begin building every part better than the last. As a result, more than 300 partners increase their productivity and win more business.

If you are interested in AREA membership, please contact Mark Sage, Executive Director.

To inquire about DMDII membership, please contact Liz Stuck ([email protected]), Director of Membership Engagement

The Augmented Reality (AR) marketplace is evolving so rapidly, it’s a challenge to gauge the current state of market education, enterprise adoption, provider investment, and more. What are the greatest barriers to growth? How quickly are companies taking pilots into production? Where should the industry be focusing its efforts?

To answer these and other questions and better measure trends and momentum, we at the AREA are pleased to launch our second annual ecosystem survey.

The survey takes only five minutes to complete. Submissions will be accepted through February 16, 2018. We’ll compile the responses and share the results as soon as they’re available.

Take the survey here.

Make sure your thoughts and observations are captured so our survey will be as comprehensive and meaningful as possible. Thank you!

2017 was the year that Augmented Reality emerged from the trough of disillusionment. Enterprise AR, with nuts-and-bolts use cases and revenue, became the fastest-growing category within the AR/VR universe. According to ARtillry intelligence, hardware and software spending in 2017 was $3 billion, more than triple that of 2016.

Some of the most compelling Enterprise AR products and business strategies were on display at CES 2018. The world’s largest consumer electronics convention was an excellent opportunity for companies to exhibit in the public eye. At the forefront this year was the convergence of trends enabling the next stage of AR: hardware development and miniaturization, user-centric design, and business model innovation.

Enterprise AR’s primary focus is on using visual data to increase the capabilities of workers. It has been found that out of the five senses, sight constitutes 83% of information processed by the brain. The value proposition for augmenting visual information is real; workers are 30% more productive with AR-information delivered in context, according to Jim Heppelmann and Mike Campbell of PTC. Hence most applications gaining traction at the moment revolve around the delivery or production of visual information.

CES 2018 also revealed some of the gaps that need to be filled for the AR movement to accelerate. First, “the world is seriously devoid of AR talent,” as Jim Heppelmann noted. Secondly, the nature of spatially-based visuals requires complex, high-resolution objects to be delivered to the user. These are generally too large and dynamic to be contained within static apps on a local client and thus need to be web streamed live. The developer community needs to establish protocols for real-time AR asset streams as it has done for web VR in the past.

Wearable displays present a different paradigm for interaction and control. A killer app may be lacking the killer interaction method. Currently the most prevalent input methods are voice, swiping, and RGB and IR camera-based gesture recognition. These will leave you wanting in adverse physical environments and when performing complex tasks such as web navigation and emails. One possibility would be leveraging micro-movements as input in the same way game controllers respond to millimeter actions: small actions allow for high ergonomic efficiency and bandwidth. This type of work is being pursued by Pison and other human computer interface firms. Other firms are experimenting with multimodal combinations of brain, eye, voice, and bioactivity signals to enable context awareness.

At CES 2018, the following companies demonstrated compelling lessons for how to find edge in a rapidly ascendant industry:

Realwear – dominate with a differentiated product

Realwear’s industrial headset has high quality voice recognition and works in environments with over 95db of noise. The headset performed well on the loud CES conference floor with no false positives, even with whispered commands. The basic list of voice commands are processed on-board for smoother operations compared to internet-enabled engines like Alexa. The HMT-1 product launched in Oct 2017 and has such rapid uptake that it will be one of the top three AR headsets in use in 2018. Over 200 customers and 75 solution partners are using HMT-1 already.

In the crowded field of headset companies, Realwear has been able to achieve quick adoption and growth rates by catering to a specific user base. The company primarily serves rugged industries where using hands to do work is critically important. Matt Firlik, Head of Marketing & Business Operations, says, “The number one application is remote mentor, which gives field workers access to experts located on the other side of the site, or other side of the world.”  With that use case, remote experts can annotate what users see on their micro-display, and coach them through complex maintenance or assembly procedures. Other use cases enable users to complete work orders, view documents like complex schematics, and engage with IoT data. According to Firlik, “the HMT-1 gives workers in the field a voice that keeps them connected to their colleagues, the back office, and the work they have to do since they will never have to pick up a tablet or clipboard to do their job again.”

The company’s success is a testament to the power of product differentiation and strong focus. Realwear’s technology bets on the interaction method of on-board voice as a competitive advantage. There is no dependence on technologies utilized by other headsets such head tracking, swiping, hand grasping, and cloud-processed voice. Even so, voice recognition as a whole faces a difficult journey to become a robust, standalone modality. A significant portion of users find the experience frustrating especially older workers or those with thick accents. The challenge for Realwear will be to expand rapidly and become deeply entrenched in enterprise workflows before competitors are able to catch up in voice recognition quality. (Realwear is an AREA member and participates in many of the committees seeking to reduce barriers to AR adoption.)

Augmen.tv – how AR can leverage existing huge markets

Augmen.tv is the first camera-vision and AR streaming app for TV augmentation. Content is detected on the TV and synchronized at the millisecond time frame. Key to the user experience is the multitude of interactive AR content that extends and enriches the viewing experience. The comprehensive demo included characters jumping out of the scene, sports players and statistics displaying around the TV, and placing the viewer in an immersive 360 scene.

The company stands to build upon a successful debut on European TV and test in the US on preprogrammed as well as live shows. The app was number one in the App Store in Germany with nearly a million downloads. Users were incredibly driven to experience the tech despite the app having a massive download size; the launch iOS version was 1.1 GB! The next generation will offload content to cloud and edge servers for lighter storage on user devices. The ability to call these assets in real-time will be a major technological innovation for the entire AR industry.

The business pathway for Augmen.tv could be akin to that of Amazon Web Services (AWS). Amazon built AWS out of necessity to scale internal computing capability up and down throughout the year. The excess capacity during down times presented an opportunity to sell processing power to enterprises as a standalone offering. The challenge for a young company like Augmen.tv is to manage content creation while building first-class camera vision and asset streaming capabilities. If the company achieves the balance of being both a media and tech company, then it stands to benefit from two huge markets.

Proglove – the simplest products can be highly lucrative

Proglove is a company that surprised in both its technological simplicity and its rate of success. The entire product consists of a simple bar code scanner that is worn on the back of a partial glove with an in-palm trigger. The scanner is used mainly at car manufacturing plants and package shipping warehouses. Some use cases pair it with smart glasses for assistive reality. After just two years, Proglove is already being used in every European BMW factory. The wearable, available as a complete system for $3000, saves three seconds off every task. At car plants where each worker performs one task thousands of times a day for 300 days a year, the ROI is highly significant.

The minimalist functionality of the product was the result of paying attention to customer feedback. Proglove originally sought to develop a glove with a range of features including RFID, bending sensors, motion tracking, and displays. “We found out most of the customers would be happy with a bar code scanner. That was our MVP. Simple to use. In industry, they need time to adopt. If you have something really radical, then it might kill you as a startup until you see first revenue,” explains founder Paul Gunther. It is impressive how Proglove found a way to charge a high price for ubiquitous technology. The challenge for them will be to avoid competition leading to pricing pressures. One tactic to mitigate this is to become the official supplier for clients as the company has done with BMW.

Mira – holistic design is key

Mira has developed a technologically simple yet extremely well-designed iPhone-based headset. It is highly comfortable for the user and also very socially friendly due to its transparent and open display. Others can easily see the user’s face as well as the contents being displayed. Seeing the headset in action from the outside conveys a feeling of curiosity versus enclosed VR and AR headsets. Reinforcing this feeling is the lighthearted nature of the company’s demos, which are focused on entertainment and social collaboration games. The content is app-based and allows experiences to be shared simultaneously on both the headsets and phones.

The most critical aspect of Mira’s innovation may be the design of the holistic user experience. By presenting easy-to-use, full-experience tech in a non-geeky manner, Mira has created a beautiful product that could greatly accelerate the wide scale adoption of AR. It is easy to imagine the next social AR hit like Pokemon Go being played on a Mira headset. The challenge for a company with a technologically minimalist product like theirs is to build a competitive moat around the full stack ecosystem and software environment and find ways to enforce use of their headset versus the eventual knockoffs.

It is important for the Enterprise AR community to recognize the collective value in developing and validating solutions for AR’s current shortcomings. In an industry experiencing triple-digit growth each year, there is impetus to join the rising tide or risk being left behind. As Jay Sumit, Deloitte Independent Vice Chairman, said, “In 2018 you will see a bifurcation of businesses that embrace AR and those that cease to exist.” The companies that actively learn from shared resources and membership organizations stand to gain the most from the AR movement.

___

Dexter Ang is CEO of Pison, a company building the future of human computer interaction and bioelectric control. The company develops full-stack wearable technology for intuitive and powerful gesture control of augmented reality smart glasses. Pison has developed and patented electroneurography, or ENG, the first process for sensing peripheral nerve firings on the surface of the skin. Vertically-integrated solutions combine hardware, software, machine learning, and UI for AR industries. Investors and partners include Oculus, MIT, Draper, National Science Foundation, and HHS.

One of the highlights of CES 2018 earlier this month was the introduction of an enterprise AR reference design from Flex. We spoke about it recently with Geof Wheelwright, director of marketing communications for Atheer, AREA member and a partner in the Flex announcement.

AREA: What is the purpose of the Flex enterprise AR reference design unveiled at CES?

WHEELWRIGHT: The purpose of the Flex AR reference design is to reduce time to market for companies making AR devices for enterprise and consumer applications. It includes a complete product specification, including a head-mounted display (HMD), an external processing unit (EPU), a gesture-based software platform (developed with Atheer) to manage interaction, and pre-installed Enterprise AR software. By customizing the rugged, stable and high-quality Flex AR reference design versus developing their own AR hardware, companies can significantly reduce product development costs and quickly scale manufacturing.

AREA: What is the significance of this announcement to the enterprise AR market?

WHEELWRIGHT: The significance of this announcement is that it provides a new standard for AR hardware and interaction – and a very real path to a much broader range of participants in the enterprise AR hardware market. It also goes beyond a mere hardware specification by including an interaction model that is multi-modal (i.e., it supports head motion, voice control and gestures) and a 30-day trial of Atheer AiR™ Enterprise. That means customers can immediately start using remote expert collaboration (“see what I see”) and authoring and deliver workflows and step-by-step task guidance for their unique needs. In addition, Flex will provide a full software development kit (SDK) to customers who are building on Android Nougat. The sum of all those parts means that OEMs have access to an AR offering that can provide real value to enterprise customers right out of the box.

Flex designed augmented reality headset and belt pack reference design (PRNewsfoto/Flex)

AREA: Can you give us an example of how the reference design reduces time to market?

WHEELWRIGHT: A typical hardware development cycle would involve bringing together a number of key standardized components (including operating system, processor, specialized hardware) around a particular design for a particular purpose. Hardware designers would then build and test prototypes, refine those prototypes (and then retest them as they add new components), field-test and debug the prototype. They would then have to figure out how they would manufacture the device. And all of that is before you run a single piece of third-party software on your new device.

Manufacturers using the Flex AR reference design get the advantage of a pre-designed system that is already tested and already works – cutting out a lot of the time typically involved in new hardware development. It includes cutting-edge technology from partners, including the Snapdragon 835 mobile platform from Qualcomm, designed to deliver full-color, 1080p augmented reality experiences. The Snapdragon 835 draws 25 percent less power than previous models, using an advanced 10-nanometer design.

AREA: What is Atheer’s role in the reference design?

WHEELWRIGHT: Atheer came to this project with unique experience in having designed our own smart glasses (the well-received Atheer AiR glasses) and was able to bring that to bear on helping Flex create the Flex AR reference design. Specifically, Atheer contributed our standardized multi-modal interaction model. “We know the challenge of designing a cutting-edge platform that can be mass produced,” said Soulaiman Itani, Chief Executive Officer and founder of Atheer, in his comments on the Flex announcement. “Through our work with Flex, we’ve seen their capabilities, and we’re pleased to help provide a UI system that supports gestures, voice, head motion and Bluetooth wearables for hands-free operation. We are looking forward to Flex enterprise customers being able to experience the out-of-the-box Augmented Reality tools in Atheer’s AiR Enterprise™ productivity solution for augmented reality.”

AREA: Why has Atheer partnered with Flex?

WHEELWRIGHT: Flex has the global reach, experience and respect in the electronics hardware manufacturing industry to help make our interaction model an industry standard – and bring enterprise users the real and immediate safety and productivity benefits of our flagship Atheer AiR™ Enterprise software.

AREA: Does this represent a change or an evolution in the Atheer business strategy?

WHEELWRIGHT: It represents an evolution. In 2012, Atheer was founded on a belief that AR technology could make a significant and measurable difference in how workers at industrial enterprises do their work. In the company’s initial stages, the Atheer team explored the ideal hardware needed to create impactful enterprise AR applications. It also affirmed the idea that, in order to be really useful, AR hardware would need to be based on popular, well-supported mobile operating system platforms (starting with Android).

That work led initially to the development of Atheer AiR Glasses, which later become the foundation for a reference design platform called AiR Experience that Atheer now sells (combined with a multi-modal interaction platform and access to Atheer’s partner engineering team) and is a key element of the work with Flex. The company now offers Air Experience alongside its flagship Atheer AiR™ Enterprise software, which provides real and immediate benefit for customers such as Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (PCNA). PCNA announced late last year the introduction of “Tech Live Look,” an AR technology designed to improve technical services at Porsche dealerships in the United States. “Tech Live Look” uses AiR Enterprise™ in conjunction with lightweight smart glasses.

AREA: Can we expect other similar partnerships to be announced in the near future?

WHEELWRIGHT: We are continually evaluating other partnership opportunities to help grow the market for AR solutions in the enterprise that leverage our experience and help bolster the development of key interaction standards for the AR industry.

AREA: How will this and other partnerships accelerate the adoption of AR in the enterprise?

WHEELWRIGHT: Enterprises want measurable value, power, interaction standards that make sense – as well as proven enterprise-grade applications using hardware from manufacturers they trust on operating systems they know. Our platform delivers all of those elements and helps to significantly lower barriers to adoption in a way that should move customers from limited, line of business-driven “proof of concept” lab trials to serious IT-supported evaluations that can be rolled out broadly throughout an enterprise.

The AREA recently distributed the products of its second AREA-funded research project, an ROI Calculator and Best Practice Report. Conducted by Strategy Analytics under the supervision of AREA member PEREY Research & Consulting, the research examined the approaches taken by market leaders that are identifying, prioritizing, and managing costs and returns on their AR investments.

The ROI Calculator and Best Practice Report are available exclusively to AREA members, but non-members can download an abstract of the Best Practice Report and a sample ROI Case Study here.

Based on interviews conducted with AREA members and members of the Strategy Analytics Enterprise Customer panel, the research report identifies five critical best practices for companies to follow in preparing and conducting successful ROI analyses for enterprise AR projects. Companies following these practices are able to articulate and explain technology spending that will aid in decision making, and to accrue the greatest measurable benefits from their AR investment over the long term.

Along with the best practice report, the AREA has produced an Excel spreadsheet that enables companies to enter variables and calculate the ROI for their AR projects following well-established methodologies used by financial analysts.

The spreadsheet walks the user through the process: establishing the business case; assessing AR solution costs; inputting business financial metrics. The ROI Calculator produces annual AR solution costs and benefits allocations and an ROI analysis and cost/benefit overview that reveals the cumulative net benefits over several years.

“Companies that follow these practices when undertaking ROI analysis on their AR projects will be able to articulate and explain technology spending,” said Christine Perey of PEREY Research & Consulting. “This will aid their decision making and enable them to accrue the greatest measurable benefits from their AR investments over the long term.”

Download your free copies of the Best Practice Report abstract and ROI Case Study here.   To obtain the full ROI Calculator and Best Practice Report – and enjoy a host of other benefits – join the AREA. Click here to learn more.

The new members come from every corner of the AR ecosystem, including app developers, interaction technology providers, manufacturing solutions providers, AR wearables manufacturers, and vertical industry solutions providers.

New Contributing Members include Crunchfish, Manufacturing Technology Centre (MTC), Mobiliya, Proceedix, and RealWear. The AREA has also welcomed four members in its recently-announced Startup level of membership: CrossComm, EyeSucceed, Iristick, and Pison.

“As Enterprise AR adoption grows, we are seeing more companies joining the AREA to forge connections, share information, and influence the future of the industry,” said Mark Sage, AREA Executive Director. “We welcome these new members to the alliance and look forward to supporting their needs and benefiting from their expertise.”

The AREA supports innovative companies pursuing AR initiatives that need a better understanding of the tools available, application possibilities, methods of implementation and return on investment. It provides a free and open exchange of best practices, lessons learned, and technological insights that can help enterprises effectively implement AR technology, boost operational efficiency and create long term benefit.

The AREA’s membership benefits include access to high-quality, vendor-neutral content and participation in various programs, a research framework to address key challenges shared by all members, discounts for fee-based events, and more. Sponsor members have a direct role in shaping the rapidly expanding AR industry and demonstrate their companies’ leadership and commitment to improving workplace performance.

About the new AREA members

Crunchfish

Crunchfish develops and markets software that creates new possibilities for interaction with mobile and wearable devices. The company enables gesture interaction in AR/VR environments and its mobile proximity technology creates innovative solutions for m-commerce, social apps and context independent information in AR smart glasses. Crunchfish technologies are licensed to hardware manufacturers and application developers and are currently available in millions of devices from global players. Crunchfish has been listed on Nasdaq First North since 2016. The company was founded in 2010 and is based in Sweden.

Manufacturing Technology Centre (MTC)

The vision of the MTC is to inspire Great British manufacturing on the global stage. The organization provides integrated manufacturing system solutions across a broad range of industries. One of seven High Value Manufacturing Catapult centres in the UK, the MTC is at the forefront of a number of innovative technologies including digital manufacturing, robotics and additive manufacturing. It is headquartered in Coventry, England.

Mobiliya

Mobiliya is a global engineering and design services company, enabling digital transformation for the world’s leading organizations, through disruptive technologies such as AR/VR, IoT and AI. Mobiliya develops innovative solutions to enhance training efficiency and field service productivity based on AR, focusing on industries such as healthcare, telecom, and manufacturing, where complex equipment and workflows are used. Mobiliya also offers content development services to convert available business content to create 3D models and animations for immersive experiences. Mobiliya’s AR360 solution platform shortens the time to market when creating AR-based field support applications, step-by-step guidance, troubleshooting and training that can be consumed on mobile devices, tablets and smart glasses. AR360´s content management system gives customers the ability to easily create and modify content without the need for software development, and to instantly publish it to authorized field users.

Proceedix

Proceedix offers a solution for easy and agile procedure management, made paperless and mobile. A Web-based content platform enables users to manage all their checklists and work instructions, making the execution of work instructions and inspections fully mobile and traceable while bringing organizations the benefits of powerful statistics. Proceedix software runs on Glass Enterprise Edition and Iristick’s smart safety glasses, tablet and mobile phone, enabling field experts or factory workers to work faster, more focused and hands-free. Proceedix is headquartered in Belgium.

RealWear

RealWear is a leader in ruggedized industrial wearables. Its flagship product, the HMT-1, is the world’s first industrial voice-driven, completely hands-free, head-mounted wearable computing device. RealWear recently received the Frost & Sullivan New Product Innovation Award for Industrial Wearables.

CrossComm

CrossComm is an award-winning mobile, web, and immersive app studio focused on leveraging innovative mobile and cloud-based app technologies to solve real-world problems. The company’s CrossComm Labs initiative explores practical applications of AR and Artificial Intelligence. Headquartered in Durham, North Carolina, CrossComm has deployed several mobile AR app solutions and is developing app solutions for HoloLens and other head-worn AR/MR devices.

EyeSucceed

EyeSucceed brings together the power of Augmented Reality and wearable technology to transform how the food industry addresses real-world challenges, such as high labor costs, employee training, and consistent execution. EyeSucceed is leveraging the power of AR for smart training, reducing labor costs, driving consistent execution, and improving food safety and quality.

Iristick

Based in Belgium, Iristick designs and manufactures smart glasses for industrial applications. Iristick glasses leverage the power of your existing mobile device and are distinguished by their exceptional performance, long battery life, rugged design, safety, and comfort.

Pison

Pison creates transformational human-computer interaction to expand the horizon of human capabilities. The company develops wearable devices that use biopotential on the surface of the skin as input, enabling intuitive and powerful gesture control of smart glasses and robotics. Vertically-integrated solutions combine hardware, software, machine learning, and UI for AR industries. Investors and partners include Oculus, MIT, Draper, and the National Science Foundation.

Now Augmented Reality is getting the HBR spotlight in the November/December issue – and you can download a copy of the article HERE.

In it, noted strategist, author, and Bishop William Lawrence University Professor at the Harvard Business School, Michael Porter and Jim Heppelmann, president and CEO of AREA member PTC, provide business leaders with a comprehensive exploration of AR, from definition to applications to benefits.

“The title of the article says it all – Why Every Organization Needs an Augmented Reality Strategy,” noted Marc Schuetz of PTC, an AREA board member. “It makes a very strong case for how AR will change how we interact with the world around us.”

Jon Lang, lead principal business analyst at PTC, noted that the article is the third in a series written by Porter and Heppelmann. “In 2014, they wrote about smart, connected products and the Internet of Things. Next, they researched the organizational implications of smart, connected products and the data they produce on companies using or making these products. Now, in this third article, they discuss how AR is one of the best ways to channel the value of the data that smart, connected products create.”

As the article puts it, “AR enables a new information-delivery paradigm, which we believe will have a profound impact on how data is structured, managed, and delivered.”

Porter and Heppelmann highlight several real-life examples of AR applications, including AREA members Newport News Shipbuilding and Boeing. It discusses how Xerox used AR to improve field engineers’ first-time fix rates by 67% and how AR enabled KPN, a European telecommunications services provider, to reduce overall service team costs by 11%.

The article even comes with an AR experience accessible via an app download to give readers a first-hand sample of AR in action. Watch a video of the experience HERE.

PTC’s Jon Lang sees the HBR article as a great way to educate business leaders about AR. “Porter and Heppelmann make a compelling case for why this technology is so powerful and why executives should consider integrating it into their strategies now – because there are a lot of opportunities and the technology is ready today.”

Get your free copy of the article HERE.